Eggleston v. Asotin Cnty.

Washington Supreme Court

Eggleston v. Asotin Cnty.

414 P.3d 576, 190 Wash. 2d 1012

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedApril 4, 2018

DocketNo. 95429-1

StatusPublished

This text of 414 P.3d 576 (Eggleston v. Asotin Cnty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eggleston v. Asotin Cnty., 414 P.3d 576, 190 Wash. 2d 1012 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for attorney fees is also denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for attorney fees is also denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 P.3d 576, 190 Wash. 2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eggleston-v-asotin-cnty-wash-2018.