Eggert v. Miller
This text of 595 P.2d 1050 (Eggert v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The petitioner-appellant was arrested in Colorado and held for extradition to Pennsylvania. He filed a petition in the trial court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging that the extradition request failed to establish probable cause that he committed the offenses with which he is charged. The trial court after hearing discharged the writ. We affirm its judgment.
In Michigan v. Doran, 439 U.S. 282, 99 S.Ct. 530, 58 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978), the United States Supreme Court held that a determination of probable cause by a neutral judicial officer of the demanding state is binding upon the courts of the asylum state. In the present case, the complaint provided by the state of Pennsylvania contains a statement by a Pennsylvania magistrate that “there is probable cause for the issuance of process.”
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 P.2d 1050, 198 Colo. 22, 1979 Colo. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eggert-v-miller-colo-1979.