Eggert v. Binder
125 A. 106, 100 N.J.L. 174, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 215
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, fox the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eggert v. Binder, 125 A. 106, 100 N.J.L. 174, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1924).
125 A. 106 (Eggert v. Binder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meszaros v. Gransamer
128 A.2d 449 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)