Eggers v. Busch

39 N.E. 619, 154 Ill. 604
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 39 N.E. 619 (Eggers v. Busch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eggers v. Busch, 39 N.E. 619, 154 Ill. 604 (Ill. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In this court both parties have contented themselves with filing the same briefs and arguments used by them in the Appellate Court, and no questions, therefore, are raised here which were not presented to and considered by that court. After giving the record careful consideration we find no grounds for disturbing the judgment of affirmance, As we are satisfied with both the reasoning and conclusions of the Appellate 'Court set forth in the foregoing opinion, we see no occasion for any further discussion, on our part, of the questions involved in the case. The judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed.

Judgment, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rackouski v. Dobson
634 N.E.2d 1229 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1994)
Marcy v. Markiewicz
599 N.E.2d 1051 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1992)
Brown v. Yacht Club of Coeur D'Alene, Ltd.
722 P.2d 1062 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1986)
Sinks v. Karleskint
474 N.E.2d 767 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1985)
Wilfong v. W. A. Schickedanz Agency, Inc.
406 N.E.2d 828 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
Campbell v. Doherty
206 P.2d 1145 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1949)
Zimmerman v. Wilkson
290 P. 795 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930)
Gepford v. Burge
5 F.2d 829 (D. Colorado, 1925)
Cobb v. Willrett
144 N.E. 834 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1924)
Craig v. White
202 P. 648 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Blunt v. Kelly
219 Ill. App. 327 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)
Bell v. Stadler
174 P. 129 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1918)
Summy v. Ramsey
101 P. 506 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Bauman v. Stoller
139 Ill. App. 393 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)
Harrass v. Edwards
69 N.W. 69 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 N.E. 619, 154 Ill. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eggers-v-busch-ill-1895.