Egerman v. Mattesino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Egerman v. Mattesino

9 A.D.2d 904, 195 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 904 (Egerman v. Mattesino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Egerman v. Mattesino, 9 A.D.2d 904, 195 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

— Consolidated action in the City Court of Yonkers by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries, and by his father for medical expenses (Action No. 1), and to recover damages for injuries to person and property (Action No. 2). The appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of respondent for $1,049 in Action No. 2 and dismissing the complaint in Action No. 1. A motor vehicle owned by appellant, Harry Egerman, and operated by his son, appellant Ernest P. Egerman, was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle owned and operated by respondent. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Consolidated action in the City Court of Yonkers by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries, and by his father for medical expenses (Action No. 1), and to recover damages for injuries to person and property (Action No. 2). The appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of respondent for $1,049 in Action No. 2 and dismissing the complaint in Action No. 1. A motor vehicle owned by appellant, Harry Egerman, and operated by his son, appellant Ernest P. Egerman, was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle owned and operated by respondent. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 904, 195 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egerman-v-mattesino-nyappdiv-1959.