Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
EGENERA, INC., Appellant
v.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ______________________
2019-1353 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 01340. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAMES ELROY QUIGLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN BRUCE CAMPBELL, KATHY HSINJUNG LI; CHRISTOPHER THOR BOVENKAMP, Dallas, TX.
THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.