Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 14, 2020·No. 19-1353·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EGENERA, INC., Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ______________________

2019-1353 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 01340. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JAMES ELROY QUIGLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN BRUCE CAMPBELL, KATHY HSINJUNG LI; CHRISTOPHER THOR BOVENKAMP, Dallas, TX.

THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2020).

Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.