Egenberger v. United Properties Co.

California Court of Appeal

Egenberger v. United Properties Co.

53 Cal. App. 799

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 7, 1921

DocketCiv. No. 3849

StatusPublished

This text of 53 Cal. App. 799 (Egenberger v. United Properties Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Egenberger v. United Properties Co., 53 Cal. App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

NOURSE, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for forty-seven thousand dollars and interest against the defendant for breach of its contract to deliver certain bonds. The facts of the case are similar to those considered in Knabbe v. United Properties Company of California, ante, p. 434, [200 Pac. 369], and by stipulation of counsel this appeal has been submitted upon the same set of briefs.

For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOURSE, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for forty-seven thousand dollars and interest against the defendant for breach of its contract to deliver certain bonds. The facts of the case are similar to those considered in Knabbe v. United Properties Company of California, ante, p. 434, [200 Pac. 369], and by stipulation of counsel this appeal has been submitted upon the same set of briefs.

For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Cal. App. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egenberger-v-united-properties-co-calctapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack