Egelston v. . the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Rd. Co.
This text of 98 N.E. 748 (Egelston v. . the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that, while the custom of other companies was not controlling it was competent evidence to he considered by the jury in determining as to the *580 necessity or propriety of a rule regulating the movement of cars, and that the exclusion of proof of the custom was too serious an error to he disregarded. No opinion.
Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 N.E. 748, 205 N.Y. 579, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egelston-v-the-new-york-chicago-and-st-louis-rd-co-ny-1912.