Egelston v. . the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Rd. Co.
98 N.E. 748, 205 N.Y. 579, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1327
Opinions
Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that, while the custom of other companies was not controlling it was competent evidence to he considered by the jury in determining as to the *580 necessity or propriety of a rule regulating the movement of cars, and that the exclusion of proof of the custom was too serious an error to he disregarded. No opinion.
Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Egelston v. . the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Rd. Co., 98 N.E. 748, 205 N.Y. 579, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1327 (N.Y. 1912).
98 N.E. 748 (Egelston v. . the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Long Island Rail Road
212 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Danbois v. New York Central Railroad
189 N.E.2d 468 (New York Court of Appeals, 1963)
Schwer v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co.
161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 15 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1954)
Korngold v. Lenox Baths
155 N.Y.S. 241 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)