Egbunike v. Keisler

254 F. App'x 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2007·No. No. 07-1605·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nkem Egbunike, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its [227]*227discretion in denying Egbunike’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a) (2007); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Egbunike, No. A76-590-438 (B.I.A. May 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egbunike v. Keisler, 254 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2007).

254 F. App'x 226 (Egbunike v. Keisler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty
502 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1992)