Egbert v. Penk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Egbert v. Penk

646 P.2d 639, 57 Or. App. 830, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3552

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 16, 1982

DocketNo. A8104-02371, CA A22342

StatusPublished

This text of 646 P.2d 639 (Egbert v. Penk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Egbert v. Penk, 646 P.2d 639, 57 Or. App. 830, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3552 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This was an action for personal injuries brought by a child against her mother, inter alia.1 The mother’s liability was allegedly based upon simple negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to the mother. The child appeals. We affirm, based upon the established doctrine that an action will not lie in these circumstances for mere negligence. Cowgill v. Adm’r v. Boock, Adm’r, 189 Or 282, 218 P2d 445 (1950).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This was an action for personal injuries brought by a child against her mother, inter alia.1 The mother’s liability was allegedly based upon simple negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to the mother. The child appeals. We affirm, based upon the established doctrine that an action will not lie in these circumstances for mere negligence. Cowgill v. Adm’r v. Boock, Adm’r, 189 Or 282, 218 P2d 445 (1950).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 P.2d 639, 57 Or. App. 830, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egbert-v-penk-orctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack