Egbert v. Penk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Egbert v. Penk

646 P.2d 639, 57 Or. App. 830, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3552

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 16, 1982·No. No. A8104-02371, CA A22342·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This was an action for personal injuries brought by a child against her mother, inter alia.1 The mother’s liability was allegedly based upon simple negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to the mother. The child appeals. We affirm, based upon the established doctrine that an action will not lie in these circumstances for mere negligence. Cowgill v. Adm’r v. Boock, Adm’r, 189 Or 282, 218 P2d 445 (1950).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This was an action for personal injuries brought by a child against her mother, inter alia.1 The mother’s liability was allegedly based upon simple negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to the mother. The child appeals. We affirm, based upon the established doctrine that an action will not lie in these circumstances for mere negligence. Cowgill v. Adm’r v. Boock, Adm’r, 189 Or 282, 218 P2d 445 (1950).

Affirmed.

Egbert v. Penk, 646 P.2d 639, 57 Or. App. 830, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3552 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

646 P.2d 639 (Egbert v. Penk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related