Egbert v. Brooks

3 Del. 110
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided June 15, 1840·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

A voluntary trustee, not stipulating for compensation, is not entitled to any compensation for time and trouble; he is entitled to have all his expenses and charges paid; to be indemnified against expense and loss, but not remunerated.

The acceptance of the assignment in this case necessarily involved the collection of the judgment and the defence of it; and, though thjs may have occasioned more trouble to the trustee than he anticipated, this cannot vary the principle, or entitle him to compensation for performing a trust which he voluntai’ily undertook without any stipulation for compensation.

Decree affirmed except as to the item of interest on the balance in the trustee’s hands which is disallowed; the fund not being a productive one in his hands, and he had advanced of his own money for the benefit of the cestuis que trust.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egbert v. Brooks, 3 Del. 110 (Del. 1840).

3 Del. 110 (Egbert v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.