Egberongbe v. State

765 So. 2d 108, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6803, 2000 WL 718160
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2000·No. No. 1D98-1109·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is a timely appeal from a conviction and sentence for second-degree murder. The only direct evidence presented by the state consisted of testimony from an eyewitness who implicated appellant’s brother as the perpetrator, rather than appellant. Moreover, the scientific and circumstantial evidence presented by the state did not clearly contradict that testimony. We conclude that the evidence will not sustain appellant’s conviction; therefore, we need not reach the remaining issues raised on appeal. We reverse the conviction and remand with directions to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., concurs with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egberongbe v. State, 765 So. 2d 108, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6803, 2000 WL 718160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 108 (Egberongbe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. State
113 So. 3d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)