Egan v. Walsh

The Superior Court of New York City

Egan v. Walsh

11 Jones & S. 402

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedFebruary 4, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Jones & S. 402 (Egan v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Egan v. Walsh, 11 Jones & S. 402 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

—Upon the whole case, as it was made to appear on the motion below, sufficient grounds appeared to authorize the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to appoint a receiver during the pendency of the suit. The action is in a condition to be tried at once, and at the trial the rights of all parties can be more satisfactorily determined than upon the present appeal.

The papers submitted presenting a case within the rule warranting the order as made, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

—Upon the whole case, as it was made to appear on the motion below, sufficient grounds appeared to authorize the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to appoint a receiver during the pendency of the suit. The action is in a condition to be tried at once, and at the trial the rights of all parties can be more satisfactorily determined than upon the present appeal.

The papers submitted presenting a case within the rule warranting the order as made, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Jones & S. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egan-v-walsh-nysuperctnyc-1878.