Egan v. Walsh

11 Jones & S. 402
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided February 4, 1878·Published

Opinion

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

—Upon the whole case, as it was made to appear on the motion below, sufficient grounds appeared to authorize the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to appoint a receiver during the pendency of the suit. The action is in a condition to be tried at once, and at the trial the rights of all parties can be more satisfactorily determined than upon the present appeal.

The papers submitted presenting a case within the rule warranting the order as made, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egan v. Walsh, 11 Jones & S. 402 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

11 Jones & S. 402 (Egan v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.