Egan v. Swint

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Egan v. Swint

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided September 3, 1771·Published

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. John Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainant and on reading the affidavit of John Pringle of the Service of the Subpena to appear and answer and also on reading the Certificate of the Register that John Swint and Philip Mensing two of the Defendants in the above Cause have not nor hath either of them as yet entered their Appearance in this office to the Bill [587]*587filed in this Cause It is therefore ordred that an Attachment do forthwith issue against the said John Swint and Philip Mensing for not appearing and answering.

Wm Burrows Mag. in C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. John Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainant and on reading the affidavit of John Pringle of the Service of the Subpena to appear and answer and also on reading the Certificate of the Register that John Swint and Philip Mensing two of the Defendants in the above Cause have not nor hath either of them as yet entered their Appearance in this office to the Bill [587]*587filed in this Cause It is therefore ordred that an Attachment do forthwith issue against the said John Swint and Philip Mensing for not appearing and answering.

Wm Burrows Mag. in C.

Egan v. Swint, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1771).

Pincite

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586 (Egan v. Swint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.