Egan v. Swint

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Egan v. Swint

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 3, 1771

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586 (Egan v. Swint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Egan v. Swint, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1771).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. John Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainant and on reading the affidavit of John Pringle of the Service of the Subpena to appear and answer and also on reading the Certificate of the Register that John Swint and Philip Mensing two of the Defendants in the above Cause have not nor hath either of them as yet entered their Appearance in this office to the Bill [587]*587filed in this Cause It is therefore ordred that an Attachment do forthwith issue against the said John Swint and Philip Mensing for not appearing and answering.

Wm Burrows Mag. in C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. John Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainant and on reading the affidavit of John Pringle of the Service of the Subpena to appear and answer and also on reading the Certificate of the Register that John Swint and Philip Mensing two of the Defendants in the above Cause have not nor hath either of them as yet entered their Appearance in this office to the Bill [587]*587filed in this Cause It is therefore ordred that an Attachment do forthwith issue against the said John Swint and Philip Mensing for not appearing and answering.

Wm Burrows Mag. in C.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egan-v-swint-ctchansc-1771.