Egan v. Pensek Truck Leasing Co., L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Egan v. Pensek Truck Leasing Co., L.P.

228 A.D.2d 230, 643 N.Y.2d 996, 643 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6529

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The alleged inconsistencies in plaintiffs’ versions of the accident, in which the issue was whether the son was in the "zone of danger” (Bovsun v Sanperi, 61 NY2d 219) when he allegedly saw his father struck by defendants’ vehicle, present issues for the trier of fact (Silva v 81st St. & Ave. A Corp., 169 AD2d 402, 404, lv denied 77 NY2d 810; Faber v New York City Hous. Auth., 202 AD2d 269). We have considered plaintiffs’ argument for affirmative relief and find it to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The alleged inconsistencies in plaintiffs’ versions of the accident, in which the issue was whether the son was in the "zone of danger” (Bovsun v Sanperi, 61 NY2d 219) when he allegedly saw his father struck by defendants’ vehicle, present issues for the trier of fact (Silva v 81st St. & Ave. A Corp., 169 AD2d 402, 404, lv denied 77 NY2d 810; Faber v New York City Hous. Auth., 202 AD2d 269). We have considered plaintiffs’ argument for affirmative relief and find it to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Egan v. Pensek Truck Leasing Co., L.P., 228 A.D.2d 230, 643 N.Y.2d 996, 643 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

228 A.D.2d 230 (Egan v. Pensek Truck Leasing Co., L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related