Egan v. Nichols
This text of 258 A.D. 867 (Egan v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to justify a finding that the defendant was chargeable with knowledge that the deceased was in a position of danger when the truck was put in motion. Upon the new trial to be had, if again defendant calls no witnesses, we direct attention to the decision in Hayden v. New York Railways Company (233 N. Y. 34) and our recent decision in Milio v. Railway Motor Trucking Co. (257 App. Div. 640), decided October 27, 1939. Present-Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Glennon, J., concurs in result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 867, 16 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egan-v-nichols-nyappdiv-1939.