Egan v. Mosler Safe Co.
134 A.D. 920, 118 N.Y.S. 1008
Opinions
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P. J., . Jenks and Rich, JJ., concurred ; Miller, J., read for reversal, with whom Burr, J., concurred, being also of the opinion that the evidence-was insufficient to show that Sorensen was in the defendant’s employ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Egan v. Mosler Safe Co., 134 A.D. 920, 118 N.Y.S. 1008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
134 A.D. 920 (Egan v. Mosler Safe Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinnon v. Riter-Conley Manufacturing Co.
71 N.E. 296 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)