Egan v. Mosler Safe Co.

134 A.D. 920, 118 N.Y.S. 1008

This text of 134 A.D. 920 (Egan v. Mosler Safe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Egan v. Mosler Safe Co., 134 A.D. 920, 118 N.Y.S. 1008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinions

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P. J., . Jenks and Rich, JJ., concurred ; Miller, J., read for reversal, with whom Burr, J., concurred, being also of the opinion that the evidence-was insufficient to show that Sorensen was in the defendant’s employ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKinnon v. Riter-Conley Manufacturing Co.
71 N.E. 296 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D. 920, 118 N.Y.S. 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egan-v-mosler-safe-co-nyappdiv-1909.