Egan v. Levay

11 A.2d 22, 124 N.J.L. 125, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 251
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Egan v. Levay. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 N.J.L. 14
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1940·Published

Opinion

*126 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egan v. Levay, 11 A.2d 22, 124 N.J.L. 125, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1940).

11 A.2d 22 (Egan v. Levay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.