Egan v. City of New York
This text of 3 A.D.2d 827 (Egan v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The pleadings in this ease are susceptible to proof at the trial that, while the city endeavored to have the general contractor perform in accordance with the scheduled progress, its efforts were not sufficient to absolve it of liability to the plaintiff. In such instance, the city might still have a valid claim over against the general contractor in view of the latter’s agreement “to indemnify and hold the City harmless” from claims of other contractors for damages sustained “through any act or omission” on its part. Therefore, the issue of liability over should be left to the trier of the facts (Cosgrove v. City Ice & Fuel Co., 275 App. Div. 1030). Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Prank, Yalente and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 827, 161 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/egan-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1957.