Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York

68 Misc. 347
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorneys for the respective parties herein, after issue was joined by the filing of verified pleadings, signed a stipulation embodying a so-called statement of facts ” and submitted the case thus made to the court below* for decision, and from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff the defendant appeals.

The court below was wholly without jurisdiction to render judgment under such circumstances. Section 241 of the Municipal Court Act provides for a submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts; but such statement must be accompanied by an affidavit of one or more of the parties showing that such controversy is a real one, and no such affidavit is furnished in the case at bar. Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627; Weinstein v. Douglas, 51 id. 559; Neustaedter v. Weiner, 108 N. Y. Supp. 650.

Present: Seabury, Guv and Bijur, JJ.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 68 Misc. 347 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).

68 Misc. 347 (Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store
49 Misc. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Neustaedter v. Wiener
108 N.Y.S. 650 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)