Egan Slough v. Flathead County

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Egan Slough v. Flathead County. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 Mont. 81
Montana Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 2021·No. DA 21-0032·Unpublished

Opinion

10/04/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0032

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 21-0032

EGAN SLOUGH COMMUNITY, YES! FOR FLATHEAD FARMS AND WATER and AMY WALLER Plaintiffs and Appellants, ORDER

vs. FLATHEAD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, a body politic of Flathead County, FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, FLATHEAD CITY/COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT and MONTANA ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY Defendants and Appellees.

Upon consideration of Appellants’ motion brought pursuant to Montana Rule of

Appellate Civil Procedure Rule 12 (10), requesting leave to file an overlength combined

answer/reply brief, supported by affidavit of counsel, and for good cause showing, the

motion is GRANTED. Appellants may file a combined answer/reply brief not to exceed

7,500 words.

DATED AND ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court October 4 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egan Slough v. Flathead County, (Mo. 2021).

Egan Slough v. Flathead County (Egan Slough v. Flathead County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.