E.G. v. State

718 So. 2d 942, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12825, 1998 WL 712690
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 1998·No. No. 97-2732·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court in this case entered final judgment denying a petition for adoption, upon a finding of an inadequate diligent search with regard to constructive service on the biological father. We agree with the adoptive parents’ argument that having found service of process to be inadequate, the trial court should have permitted additional time to effect proper service, rather than denying the petition outright. See Condotel Bahamas, Ltd. v. Leavell Bahamas, Ltd., 276 So.2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA1973). See also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070 (providing in part “[w]hen any process is returned not executed or returned improperly executed for any defendant, the party causing its issuance shall be entitled to such additional process against the unserved party as is required to effect service.”)

The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E.G. v. State, 718 So. 2d 942, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12825, 1998 WL 712690 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 942 (E.G. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hertz v. Salman
718 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)