Efrain Carrillo Garcia A/K/A Garcia Efrain v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2012
Docket02-12-00536-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Efrain Carrillo Garcia A/K/A Garcia Efrain v. State (Efrain Carrillo Garcia A/K/A Garcia Efrain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Efrain Carrillo Garcia A/K/A Garcia Efrain v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00336-CR

David Lee Hayman § From the 30th District Court

§ of Wichita County (45,968-A)

v. § December 21, 2012

§ Per Curiam

The State of Texas § (nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00536-CR

EFRAIN CARRILLO GARCIA A/K/A APPELLANT GARCIA EFRAIN

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Appellant Efrain Carrillo Garcia a/k/a Garcia Efrain attempts to appeal from

his conviction for the sexual assault of a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann.

§ 22.011(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court’s certification of Garcia’s right to

appeal states that this “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On November 14, 2012, we notified Garcia’s retained trial counsel of

Garcia’s pro se notice of appeal, that the certification indicating that Garcia had

no right to appeal had been filed in this court, and that this appeal could be

dismissed unless Garcia or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 26,

2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). To date, we have received no response

showing any grounds for continuing the appeal. Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right of

appeal in a plea bargain case to matters that were raised by written motion filed

and ruled on before trial or to cases in which the appellant obtained the trial

court’s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). In the present case,

the trial court’s certification states that Garcia has no right to appeal and that he

has waived his right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 21, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.011
Texas PE § 22.011(a)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Efrain Carrillo Garcia A/K/A Garcia Efrain v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/efrain-carrillo-garcia-aka-garcia-efrain-v-state-texapp-2012.