Efraimson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Efraimson v. State

493 So. 2d 79, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1864, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9502

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 1986

DocketNo. 4-86-0356

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 So. 2d 79 (Efraimson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Efraimson v. State, 493 So. 2d 79, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1864, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9502 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for post-conviction relief which claimed that insufficient reasons had been given by the sentencing judge for deviating from the sentencing guidelines. We affirm, not only because we find no error in the deviation, see State v. Baker, 483 So.2d 423 (Fla.1986) and Ballard v. State, 11 F.L.W. 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA May 21, 1986), but because we believe appellant, who appealed his conviction and sentence but was unsuccessful, had no right to subsequently challenge alleged sentencing errors that could and should have been raised on appeal. Richardson v. State, 491 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for post-conviction relief which claimed that insufficient reasons had been given by the sentencing judge for deviating from the sentencing guidelines. We affirm, not only because we find no error in the deviation, see State v. Baker, 483 So.2d 423 (Fla.1986) and Ballard v. State, 11 F.L.W. 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA May 21, 1986), but because we believe appellant, who appealed his conviction and sentence but was unsuccessful, had no right to subsequently challenge alleged sentencing errors that could and should have been raised on appeal. Richardson v. State, 491 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 So. 2d 79, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1864, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/efraimson-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack