E.F. Johnson Company v. Smartlink, Inc., Smartlink Development, L.P., and Connecticut Mobilecom, Inc., and Philip A. Keefer and Ronald D. Shaw
This text of 59 F.3d 181 (E.F. Johnson Company v. Smartlink, Inc., Smartlink Development, L.P., and Connecticut Mobilecom, Inc., and Philip A. Keefer and Ronald D. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 181
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
E.F. JOHNSON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
SMARTLINK, INC., Smartlink Development, L.P., and
Connecticut Mobilecom, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,
and
Philip A. Keefer and Ronald D. Shaw, Defendants.
No. 95-1088.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 21, 1995.
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it is
ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 181, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22850, 1995 WL 242389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ef-johnson-company-v-smartlink-inc-smartlink-devel-cafc-1995.