EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin Inc

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2001·No. 00-5232·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

(48$/ (03/2<0(17 ; 23325781,7< &200,66,21  3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH   1RV &URVV$SSHOODQW  !  s26(3+ &$5/721  ,QWHUYHQLQJ  3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH   Y    +$5%(57<($5*,1 ,1&  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW  &URVV$SSHOOHH  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH:HVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI7HQQHVVHHDWsDFNVRQ 1RnsDPHV'7RGG&KLHI'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHGsXQH 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG6HSWHPEHU %HIRUH*8<1255,6DQG*,/0$1&LUFXLWsXGJHV

  ((2&HWDOY 1RV 1RV ((2&HWDOY  +DUEHUW

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ,G7KLVFHUWDLQO\ZDVQRWWKHFDVHZLWK0U'DYLV+HOLNHG QRWKLQJEHWWHUWKDQWRKDYHPHQLQWKHZRUNSODFH,IQRWZKR &2816(/ HOVHZRXOGKHURXJKKRXVHZLWK" $5*8('  )UHGHULFN s /HZLV /(:,6 ),6+(5 )LQDOO\ LQ 2QFDOH WKH FRXUW FRQFOXGHV ZLWK WKLV PRVW +(1'(5621  &/$;721 0HPSKLV 7HQQHVVHH IRU LPSRUWDQWSURQRXQFHPHQW $SSHOODQW  3DXOD %UXQHU (48$/ (03/2<0(17 23325781,7< &200,66,21 :DVKLQJWRQ '& :KDWHYHU HYLGHQWLDU\ URXWH WKH SODLQWLII FKRRVHV WR 0LFKDHO/:HLQPDQ7$780 :(,10$1+HQGHUVRQ IROORZKHRUVKHPXVWDOZD\VSURYHWKDWWKHFRQGXFWDW 7HQQHVVHHIRU$SSHOOHHV21%5,()sRKQ0RUULV5XVVHOO LVVXH ZDV QRW PHUHO\ WLQJHG ZLWK RIIHQVLYH VH[XDO 7KRPDV/+HQGHUVRQ/(:,6),6+(5+(1'(5621 FRQQRWDWLRQVEXWDFWXDOO\FRQVWLWXWHGmGLVFULPLQD>WLRQ@ &/$;721 0HPSKLV 7HQQHVVHH IRU $SSHOODQW  3DXOD EHFDXVHRIVH[l %UXQHU &DURO\Q / :KHHOHU (48$/ (03/2<0(17 23325781,7< &200,66,21 :DVKLQJWRQ '& ,GDW HOOLSVHVRPLWWHG ,GRQRWIHHOWKDWWKHSODLQWLIIKDV 0LFKDHO/:HLQPDQ7$780 :(,10$1+HQGHUVRQ VXVWDLQHGWKLVEXUGHQQRULQGHHGFRXOGKHXQGHUWKHVHIDFWV 7HQQHVVHHIRU$SSHOOHHV 6DPHVH[VH[XDOKDUDVVPHQWFDVHVRIWKLVQDWXUHSUHVHQWD *,/0$1sDQQRXQFHGWKHRSLQLRQRIWKHFRXUW*8<s VOLSSHU\ VORSH DQG WKLV FDVH HLWKHU JRHV RYHU WKH HGJH RU SS GHOLYHUHGDVHSDUDWHRSLQLRQFRQFXUULQJLQSDUW FRPHVVRFORVHWRLWWKDWDOLQHQHHGV WR EHGUDZQ,IQRW DQG GLVVHQWLQJ LQ SDUW LQ ZKLFK 1255,6 s MRLQHG  7KH ZKDWjVQH[WnWRZHOVQDSSLQJLQWKHORFNHUURRP" RSLQLRQ RI sXGJH *LOPDQ DIILUPLQJ WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW ZLWK UHVSHFW WR WKH ((2&jV FURVVDSSHDO UHJDUGLQJ WKH FODLP RI ,ZRXOGUHYHUVHWKHGHQLDORIMXGJPHQWDVDPDWWHURIODZ &HGULF:RRGVLVWKHRSLQLRQRIWKHFRXUW7KHRSLQLRQRI ZLWKUHVSHFWWR&DUOWRQjVVH[XDOKDUDVVPHQWFODLP sXGJH*X\UHYHUVLQJWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWZLWKUHVSHFWWR+DUEHUW

FRPSODLQW DOOHJHG WKDW +DUEHUW

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin Inc, (6th Cir. 2001).

EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin Inc (EEOC v. Harbert-Yeargin Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.