Eelman v. Eelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eelman v. Eelman

57 A.D.2d 731, 395 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11790

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1977·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term granted summary judgment to plaintiff pursuant to CPLR 3213 upon the theory that her claim for support payments was based upon an instrument for the payment of money only. The remedy of accelerated summary judgment under CPLR 3213 may not be granted when the underlying instrument is a separation agreement which contains covenants and conditions relating to matters other than support payments (Wagner v Cornblum, 36 AD2d 427). (Appeal from judgment of Livingston Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term granted summary judgment to plaintiff pursuant to CPLR 3213 upon the theory that her claim for support payments was based upon an instrument for the payment of money only. The remedy of accelerated summary judgment under CPLR 3213 may not be granted when the underlying instrument is a separation agreement which contains covenants and conditions relating to matters other than support payments (Wagner v Cornblum, 36 AD2d 427). (Appeal from judgment of Livingston Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

Eelman v. Eelman, 57 A.D.2d 731, 395 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

57 A.D.2d 731 (Eelman v. Eelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related