E.E. v. Norris School District
Opinion
wow 4 OU VV VR MVVUOCTI ot POO tee eV
E.E., a minor, by and through his guardian CASE NO. 1:20-CV-1291 AWI JLT ad litem, LAURA HUTCHINSON- ESCOBEDO; CHRISTOPHER ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT 17-1 ESCOBEDO; and LAURA HUTCHINSON-ESCOBEDO Plaintiffs v. NORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant Defendant Norris School District filed the January 22, 2020 IEP of Plaintiff E.E. as an attachment to legal briefing on September 30, 2020. In the docket, it is Document 17-1. The IEP was unredacted and included E.E.’s full name. E.E. is a minor. In general, there is a “very strong privacy interest” in protecting the personal information of a minor. Jenkins v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 960 F. Supp. 2d 2, 16 (D.D.C. 2013). For this reason, Document 17-1 is ordered SEALED so that it is only accessible by the court and the parties to this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ October 2, 2020 —. 7 Sz 7 Cb Lec — SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.E. v. Norris School District (E.E. v. Norris School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.