Edythe F. Robinson v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 512, 2010 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1132, 2010 WL 2978174
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
DecidedJune 25, 2010
Docket06-2699
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Vet. App. 512 (Edythe F. Robinson v. Eric K. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edythe F. Robinson v. Eric K. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 512, 2010 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1132, 2010 WL 2978174 (Cal. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On May 17, 2010, the Court issued an order remanding this case based upon the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) decision in Robinson v. Shinseki, No.2009-1176, 2010 U.S.App. LEXIS 9434 (Fed.Cir. April 19, 2010). However, the Court issued its order before mandate entered on June 14, 2010. Accordingly, the May 17 order will be withdrawn and this order issued in its stead nunc pro tunc to June 14, 2010.

On April 19, 2010, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the Court’s decision in Robinson v. Shinseki, 22 Vet.App. 440 (2009), which affirmed the Board’s denial of the appellant’s claim for disability and indemnity benefits based upon her conviction of manslaughter in her veteran husband’s death. The Federal Circuit instructed the Court to remand this matter to the Board of Veteran’ Appeals (Board) with instructions that: under Florida law intent is not necessarily an element of the crime of manslaughter because manslaughter by act or procurement, or voluntary manslaughter, includes the element of intent, but manslaughter by culpable negligence, or involuntary manslaughter does not; and that a factual determination be made as to whether the appellant intentionally and wrongfully caused the death of her veteran husband based upon the evidence of record and any additional evidence necessary for such a determination.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the May 17 order is withdrawn. It is further

ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Board for re-adjudication consistent with this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edythe F. Robinson v. Eric K. Shinseki
22 Vet. App. 440 (Veterans Claims, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Vet. App. 512, 2010 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1132, 2010 WL 2978174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edythe-f-robinson-v-eric-k-shinseki-cavc-2010.