Edylne Nicolas v. American Express

District Court, C.D. California·Decided September 10, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00246·Unknown

Opinion

STEPHEN J. NEWMAN (SBN 181570) snewman@steptoe.com docketing@steptoe.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 980 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (213) 439-9400 Facsimile: (213) 439-9599 Surya Kundu (SBN 308099) skundu@steptoe.com One Market Plaza Steuart Tower, Suite 1070 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 365-6700 Facsimile: (415) 365-6699 Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK (Counsel for additional parties listed on signature page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDYLNE NICOLAS, Case No. 2:25-cv-00246-MAR Plaintiff, v. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED AMERICAN EXPRESS, ZWICKER & SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff Edylne Nicolas and Defendants American Express National Bank (erroneously sued as American Express), Zwicker & Associates, P.C., Equifax Information Services, LLC, and Experian Information Solutions, Inc, (the “Parties”)1, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 1.2 UNDER SEAL FILING PROCEDURE The Parties acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. The Parties further acknowledge that there is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases, that good cause must be shown (with proper evidence and legal justification) to support a filing under seal, and that mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not, in and of itself, constitute good cause. The Parties stipulate and agree that any requests to seal shall be narrowly

1 On August 8, 2025, Defendant Trans Union LLC and Plaintiff filed their Joint Notice of Settlement notifying the Court of their agreement to settle and intention to tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. 1.3 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve trade secrets, private financial information and records, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, financial records and account information (including records and information implicating privacy rights of third parties), or information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and that there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit, captioned Edylne Nicolas v. American Express, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-00246-MAR. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. As used herein, “information” shall include (among other things): (i) the information itself; (ii) any notes, abstracts, summaries or any other writing or materials summarizing, referencing, or containing such information (whether in whole or in part); (iii) any documents, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, responses to requests for production, deposition transcripts, pleading, affidavit, declaration, brief, motion, transcript, or other written, recorded, graphic or electronically-stored material summarizing, referencing, or containing such information (whether in whole or in part); (iv) and all identical and non-identical copies thereof. 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: Extremely sensitive and/or proprietary “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.6 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.8 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.9 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.10 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party (including support staff). 2.12 Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, House Counsel, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.13 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.14 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edylne Nicolas v. American Express, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Edylne Nicolas v. American Express (Edylne Nicolas v. American Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related