Edylne Nicolas v. American Express

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedSeptember 10, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-00246
StatusUnknown

This text of Edylne Nicolas v. American Express (Edylne Nicolas v. American Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edylne Nicolas v. American Express, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 STEPTOE LLP STEPHEN J. NEWMAN (SBN 181570) 2 snewman@steptoe.com 3 docketing@steptoe.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 980 4 Los Angeles, CA 90067 5 Telephone: (213) 439-9400 Facsimile: (213) 439-9599 6 7 Surya Kundu (SBN 308099) skundu@steptoe.com 8 One Market Plaza 9 Steuart Tower, Suite 1070 San Francisco, CA 94105 10 Telephone: (415) 365-6700 11 Facsimile: (415) 365-6699 12 Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK 13 (Counsel for additional parties listed on signature page) 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 EDYLNE NICOLAS, Case No. 2:25-cv-00246-MAR 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 19 PROTECTIVE ORDER AMERICAN EXPRESS, ZWICKER & 20 ASSOCIATES, P.C., TRANS UNION, 21 LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN 22 INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 23 and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 24

25 26 27 28 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 4 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 5 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 6 warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiff Edylne Nicolas and Defendants American Express 7 National Bank (erroneously sued as American Express), Zwicker & Associates, P.C., 8 Equifax Information Services, LLC, and Experian Information Solutions, Inc, (the 9 “Parties”)1, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate to and 10 petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties 11 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 12 responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 13 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 14 treatment under the applicable legal principles. 15 1.2 UNDER SEAL FILING PROCEDURE 16 The Parties acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 17 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 18 under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 19 the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 20 material under seal. The Parties further acknowledge that there is a strong 21 presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial proceedings and records 22 in civil cases, that good cause must be shown (with proper evidence and legal 23 justification) to support a filing under seal, and that mere designation of Disclosure 24 or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not, in and of itself, constitute good 25 cause. The Parties stipulate and agree that any requests to seal shall be narrowly 26

27 1 On August 8, 2025, Defendant Trans Union LLC and Plaintiff filed their Joint Notice of Settlement notifying the Court of their agreement to settle and intention to 28 1 tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. 2 1.3 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 3 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, private financial information and 4 records, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical 5 and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure 6 and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. 7 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 8 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 9 confidential business practices, financial records and account information (including 10 records and information implicating privacy rights of third parties), or information 11 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or 12 otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case 13 decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to 14 facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery 15 materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep 16 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 17 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling 18 at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 19 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information 20 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be 21 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 22 non-public manner, and that there is good cause why it should not be part of the 23 public record of this case. 24 2. DEFINITIONS 25 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit, captioned Edylne Nicolas v. 26 American Express, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-00246-MAR. 27 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 28 of information or items under this Order. 1 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of 2 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 3 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the 4 Good Cause Statement. As used herein, “information” shall include (among other 5 things): (i) the information itself; (ii) any notes, abstracts, summaries or any other 6 writing or materials summarizing, referencing, or containing such information 7 (whether in whole or in part); (iii) any documents, exhibits, answers to 8 interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, responses to requests for 9 production, deposition transcripts, pleading, affidavit, declaration, brief, motion, 10 transcript, or other written, recorded, graphic or electronically-stored material 11 summarizing, referencing, or containing such information (whether in whole or in 12 part); (iv) and all identical and non-identical copies thereof. 13 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 14 Items: Extremely sensitive and/or proprietary “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or 15 Items, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a 16 substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 17 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 18 their support staff). 19 2.6 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or 20 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 22 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless 23 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 24 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 25 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 26 2.8 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 27 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 28 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 1 2.9 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 2 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 3 counsel. 4 2.10 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 5 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 6 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party 7 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 8 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 9 has appeared on behalf of that party (including support staff).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edylne Nicolas v. American Express, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edylne-nicolas-v-american-express-cacd-2025.