Edy v. Williams
1 Root 185
Opinion
It appears by the pleadings that the plaintiff hath not had a day in court in which he could be heard upon the validity of bis title; and to adjudge the bar sufficient, would preclude him from ever having an opportunity to bé heard thereon, which the law never intended.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edy v. Williams, 1 Root 185 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
1 Root 185 (Edy v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.