Edwin T. Wyman v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

273 F.2d 520, 123 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 578, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 395, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5384
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 1959
Docket15232
StatusPublished

This text of 273 F.2d 520 (Edwin T. Wyman v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwin T. Wyman v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, 273 F.2d 520, 123 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 578, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 395, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5384 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edwin T. Wyman applied January 31, 1950, for a patent on a “snap-in” valve for use on tubeless tires. His application bears Serial No. 141,503. Certain claims covering one variety of the valve were allowed by the Commissioner of Patents, but he disallowed claim 11, which is broad and generic. Thereupon Wyman sued in the United States District Court under 35 U.S.C. § 145 for an adjudication authorizing the Commissioner to issue a patent embodying generic claim 11. The District Court, after an evidentiary hearing, dismissed the complaint. Wyman appeals.

Patent No. 2,049,252, issued to Eber-hard July 28, 1936, relating to a valve for use on inner tubes, was cited by the Commissioner. The District Court held Wyman’s adaptation of the Eberhard valve structure for use in tubeless tires by making the necessary changes, though it was “ingenious,” was not the product of the inventive faculty, but of mechanical skill which could have been exercised by any person ordinarily skilled in the art who followed Eberhard’s teaching. We agree,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 F.2d 520, 123 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 578, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 395, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-t-wyman-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-cadc-1959.