Edwin Rojas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 2007
Docket07-07-00133-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Edwin Rojas v. State (Edwin Rojas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwin Rojas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-0132-CR

NO. 07-07-0133-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 24, 2007

______________________________

EDWIN ROJAS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY;

NOS. 0942114D & 0942115D; HONORABLE ROBERT K. GILL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is Edwin Rojas’s pro se Motion to Withdraw Appeal in which he expresses he no longer wishes to pursue these appeals.  As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is signed by Appellant.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, the motion is granted and the appeals are dismissed.  No motions for rehearing will be entertained and our mandates will issue forthwith.

Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.

Patrick A. Pirtle

     Justice

Do not publish.êßÕ Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court.   Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(e)(3).  Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether the parties can agree to a correction of the reporter’s record without the need for the court reporter’s recertification of the record; and (2) if the parties are unable to agree as to the correction of the record, the trial court is to order the court reporter to conform the reporter’s record to what occurred during trial and to certify the corrected record.

The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) direct the court reporter to file a corrected reporter’s record of the trial proceedings; (3) make and file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations, and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record; (4) cause the hearing proceedings to be transcribed and included in a reporter’s record; and (5) have a record of the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the supplemental clerk’s record or the reporter’s record.  In the absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the corrected reporter’s report of the trial, the supplemental clerk’s record, the reporter’s record of the hearing and proceedings pursuant to this order, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings, conclusions and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the clerk of this court not later than March 27, 2006.   Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).

So ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edwin Rojas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-rojas-v-state-texapp-2007.