Edwin Matos v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 2015
Docket4D13-3995
StatusPublished

This text of Edwin Matos v. State (Edwin Matos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwin Matos v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWIN MATOS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D13-3995

[March 18, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-015762 CF10A.

Edwin Matos, Arcadia, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to Defendant’s right to seek return of 2001 Pontiac Firebird following resolution of pending post-conviction motions and/or pending appeals from rulings on past post-conviction motions. See Sutherland v. State, 860 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutherland v. State
860 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Edwin Matos v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-matos-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.