Edwin L. Wiegand Co. v. Ooms
158 F.2d 549, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1946
DocketNo. 9135
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 158 F.2d 549 (Edwin L. Wiegand Co. v. Ooms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edwin L. Wiegand Co. v. Ooms, 158 F.2d 549, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 417 (D.C. Cir. 1946).
Opinion
It seems to us that the evidence affords a rational basis for the decision of the District Court which upheld the action of the Patent Office. Consequently we think the judgment of the District Court is correct.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. The Honorable June L. Green, (Two Cases). Eugene Byrd v. United States
499 F.2d 538 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Donald Wallace Perkins, United States of America v. Gerald Leonard Whitmore
433 F.2d 1182 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Winston
267 F. Supp. 555 (S.D. New York, 1967)
John R. Frost v. Leon R. Yankwich, Chief Judge, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division
254 F.2d 633 (Ninth Circuit, 1958)
United States v. Bessie
75 F. Supp. 95 (S.D. California, 1947)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 F.2d 549, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-l-wiegand-co-v-ooms-cadc-1946.