Edwin L. Clark v. Walter E. Craven
437 F.2d 1202
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1971·No. 25350_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The decision of the district court denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
Petitioner asserts that the California statutes proscribing possession of marihuana (for which he is incarcerated) violates due process substantively because there is no basis for a finding that a harm to society exists. The decisions are against petitioner. See People v. Irvin, 264 Cal.App.2d 747, 70 Cal.Rptr. 892, and Bettis v. United States, 9 Cir., 408 F.2d 563.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edwin L. Clark v. Walter E. Craven, 437 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1971).
437 F.2d 1202 (Edwin L. Clark v. Walter E. Craven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Earlie Wright, Jr. v. M. C. Edwards, in His Capacity as Sheriff of Lowndes County, Mississippi
470 F.2d 980 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)