Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.
This text of Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. (Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV Style: Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. Date motion filed: February 5, 2018 Type of motion: Stacy D. Blank’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Unopposed Motion of Resident Attorney Lawrence Bradley Hancock in Support of Pro Hac Vice Admission for Stacy D. Blank Party filing motion: Stacy D. Blank and Lawrence Bradley Hancock, Counsel for Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
Date: February 8, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-k-hunter-and-hunter-hunter-sonnier-llc-v-preston-marshall-texapp-2018.