Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 8, 2018·No. 01-16-00636-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV Style: Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.

Date motion filed: February 5, 2018 Type of motion: Stacy D. Blank’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Unopposed Motion of Resident Attorney Lawrence Bradley Hancock in Support of Pro Hac Vice Admission for Stacy D. Blank Party filing motion: Stacy D. Blank and Lawrence Bradley Hancock, Counsel for Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:

 Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings 

Date: February 8, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. (Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.