Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV Style: Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.
Date motion filed: February 5, 2018 Type of motion: Stacy D. Blank’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Unopposed Motion of Resident Attorney Lawrence Bradley Hancock in Support of Pro Hac Vice Admission for Stacy D. Blank Party filing motion: Stacy D. Blank and Lawrence Bradley Hancock, Counsel for Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due:
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
Date: February 8, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. (Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.