Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Associates

Fourth Circuit

Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Associates

17 F. App'x 122

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2001·No. No. 01-1177·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond L. Edwards appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Edwards’ employment discrimination and related state law claims. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Assoc., No. CA-00-1834-S (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Raymond L. Edwards appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Edwards’ employment discrimination and related state law claims. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Assoc., No. CA-00-1834-S (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Associates, 17 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

17 F. App'x 122 (Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.