Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Associates
This text of 17 F. App'x 122 (Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond L. Edwards appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Edwards’ employment discrimination and related state law claims. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Assoc., No. CA-00-1834-S (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. App'x 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-whitman-requardt-associates-ca4-2001.