Edwards v. Tubbs

87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 703, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 149
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 13, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 271 (Edwards v. Tubbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. Tubbs, 87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 703, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 149 (Colo. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole issue in this case is one of fact—the ownership of a horse, buggy and harness. The evidence was such that its decision involved the weighing of conflicting testimony of witnesses, a determination of the credit to which that of each witness was entitled and the drawing of inferences of fact from other facts, themselves, in some cases, in dispute. The case was one which lay peculiarly within the province of a trial court and outside of that of this court. Firmly established principles forbid our interference with the ultimate conclusion of the court below, which- was not reached without evidence furnishing it a reasonable support, or contrary to undisputed evidence.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 703, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-tubbs-conn-1913.