Edwards v. Trustees of the Baptist Church

92 S.E. 531, 147 Ga. 15, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1917·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where suit is brought to compel specific performance of a parol contract for land, and no facts are alleged to bring the case within any of the exceptions to the statute of frauds, the petition is demurrable. This being such a ease, and the allegations being insufficient to comply with the requirements of the' Civil Code (1910), §§ 3223, 4634, the court properly sustained a general demurrer and dismissed the petition.

2. It is true that the petition contains some general allegations of possession and part performance of the contract by the plaintiff; but when the facts stated in connection therewith are considered, the allegations are insufficient to comply with the statutes above cited. Civil Code (1910), § 4165; Kinderland v. Kirk, 131 Ga. 454 (62 S. E. 582).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Trustees of the Baptist Church, 92 S.E. 531, 147 Ga. 15, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 18 (Ga. 1917).

92 S.E. 531 (Edwards v. Trustees of the Baptist Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samford v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
115 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Hotel Candler Incorporated v. Candler
31 S.E.2d 693 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Farr v. West
110 S.E. 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)