Edwards v. State

116 S.W.2d 711, 134 Tex. Crim. 512, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 445
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 1938·No. No. 19424.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

The offense is accomplice to theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

The transcript shows that the trial court adjourned on the 16th of July, 1937, and that on the 17th of July appellant entered into recognizance on appeal. A recognizance entered into after the expiration of the term is a nullity. Articles 817 and 818, C. C. P.; Kogar v. State, 10 S.W.2d 546. Appellant being enlarged on a void recognizance, this Court is without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the appeal. Kogar v. State, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON THE MERITS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 116 S.W.2d 711, 134 Tex. Crim. 512, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 445 (Tex. 1938).

116 S.W.2d 711 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haner v. State
339 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Compton v. State
331 S.W.2d 220 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Bowers v. State
235 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Clark v. State
230 S.W.2d 234 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
State v. Gordon
38 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1949)
Myers v. State
194 S.W.2d 91 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Cisneros v. State
179 S.W.2d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Clements v. State
169 S.W.2d 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)