Edwards v. State

53 S.W.2d 1113

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Tex. Crim. 386 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 19, 1932·No. No. 15606·Published

Opinion

CALHOUN, J.

The offense, assisting in forgery; the pun-, ishment, five years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought forward. We find in the record several bills of exception, which we are unable to appraise in the absence of a statement of facts. No defect either in the- indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CALHOUN, J.

The offense, assisting in forgery; the pun-, ishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Edwards v. State, 53 S.W.2d 1113 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

53 S.W.2d 1113 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.