Edwards v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Edwards v. State

469 S.W.3d 920, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 920, 2015 WL 5435362

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 197 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2015·No. No. ED 101855·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Edwards appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and con-elude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerald Edwards appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and con-elude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Edwards v. State, 469 S.W.3d 920, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 920, 2015 WL 5435362 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

469 S.W.3d 920 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.