Edwards v. State

23 S.W.3d 847, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 934, 2000 WL 821424
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 20, 2000
DocketNo. ED 76112
StatusPublished

This text of 23 S.W.3d 847 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edwards v. State, 23 S.W.3d 847, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 934, 2000 WL 821424 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Arnell Edwards was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County of unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1994, and possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo 1994. His convictions and sentences were affirmed by this Court in State v. Edwards, 964 S.W.2d 557 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). He now appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal,1 and no error of law appears. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Edwards
964 S.W.2d 557 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.W.3d 847, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 934, 2000 WL 821424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-moctapp-2000.