Edwards v. State
171 S.E. 468, 47 Ga. App. 771, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 655
This text of 171 S.E. 468 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edwards v. State, 171 S.E. 468, 47 Ga. App. 771, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 655 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of burglary. The evidence tending to connect him with the offense was wholly circumstantial; and while it raised a strong suspicion of his guilt, it was not sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis. The court erred in refusing to grant him a new trial.
Judgment revo'sed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 468, 47 Ga. App. 771, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-gactapp-1933.