Edwards v. State
112 S.E. 169, 28 Ga. App. 473, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 653 →
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. The special ground of his motion for a new trial falls squarely within the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Calhoun v. State, 144 Ga. 679 (87 S. E. 893). This court is [474]*474bound to follow the precedents of the Supreme Court. The special assignments of error are without merit. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and his conviction has the approval of the trial judge. It- was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edwards v. State, 112 S.E. 169, 28 Ga. App. 473, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 618 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
112 S.E. 169 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Calhoun v. State
87 S.E. 893 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)