Edwards v. State

97 S.E. 205, 22 Ga. App. 796, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 764
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 1, 1918·No. 10067·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. The crime charged was designated in the indictment as “simple larceny, a felony.” The criminal act charged in the indictment was the larceny of a bale of cotton. “The name given to it, in the bill of indictment, does not characterize the offense; the description characterizes it.” O’Halloran v. State, 31 Ga. 206; Camp v. State, 3 Ga. 417 (2); Sneed v. State, 16 Ga. App. 351 (85 S. E. 354); Lummus v. State, 17 Ga. App. 414 (87 S. E. 147).

2. The grounds of the amendment to the motion show no error, the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 97 S.E. 205, 22 Ga. App. 796, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 764 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

97 S.E. 205 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brusnighan v. State
71 S.E.2d 698 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Hughes v. Georgia Power Co.
15 S.E.2d 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Perkins v. State
115 S.E. 27 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Edwards v. McNair & Sellers
114 S.E. 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)