Edwards v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Edwards v. State

104 S.E. 429, 150 Ga. 637, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 265

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 13, 1920

DocketNo. 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 429 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. State, 104 S.E. 429, 150 Ga. 637, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 265 (Ga. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial are not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, filed in this court; and counsel for plaintiff in error, on the argument in this court, expressly abandoned the errors assigned in the amendment.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion fdr new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial are not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, filed in this court; and counsel for plaintiff in error, on the argument in this court, expressly abandoned the errors assigned in the amendment.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion fdr new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 S.E. 429, 150 Ga. 637, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-ga-1920.