Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Edwards v. State

Edwards v. State

162 So. 3d 3, 2014 WL 714479, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2580
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edwards v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4669 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2014·No. No. 4D13-2148·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that demonstrates on the face of the record that juvenile convictions were used as predicate offenses to support his sentencing enhancements. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 (Fla.2011); Martinez v. State, 976 So.2d 68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); see also Gonzalez v. State, 132 So.3d 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur^

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 162 So. 3d 3, 2014 WL 714479, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2580 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

162 So. 3d 3 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez v. State
976 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Gonzalez v. State
132 So. 3d 296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)