Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Edwards v. State

Edwards v. State

35 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934, 2010 WL 1979275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2010·No. 4D09-3309·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial. We affirm. A Rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the conviction. See Prince v. State, 903 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 35 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6934, 2010 WL 1979275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

35 So. 3d 121 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
78 So. 3d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
McCray v. State
49 So. 3d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)